ArchivesChinaPakPopular PostsTrending Now


The IMF is seeing financial mess across the Belt and Road countries.

In all probability, Pakistan may plan to obtain a $12 billion bailout from the International Monetary fund on, its twelfth since the 1980s and also the largest one. This time, the International Monetary Fund ought to consider the request deliberately: Pakistan’s debt crisis is not the results of an economic shock. It is the results of reckless Chinese loans it had been indulging along with reckless spending on its Defense forces. Any new aid package can only worsen the risk of comparable problems arising elsewhere.


Under its Belt and Road Initiative, China extends lavish loans to support infrastructure comes overseas. The catch is that these deals generally need the cash to be spent on the purchase of Chinese products, services, and labor, and more importantly, the reimbursement terms are usually opaque and burdensome.

Pakistan will showcase in future how things can worsen. China is financing some $62 billion across a vast range of infrastructure projects in Pakistan. These projects include roads, ports, energy plants and business parks. It may sound great – but the devil is in the details. One Pakistani concession guarantees Chinese power plants annual returns of nearly 34% for the next 30 years, all backed by the Government of Pakistan. By comparison, Pakistan’s 10-year Government bond yields have fluctuated between 8-9% over the past year.

Worse, China is disbursing loan in U.S. dollars, hence, Pakistan will have to have a massive trade surplus to repay these dollar loans. Pakistan has been unable to export enough to get a trade surplus and has been depleting of its foreign-exchange reserves. This has led it into the front doors of the International Monetary Fund once again.

Other recipients of China’s largess have come under severe strain. Venezuela had secured its Chinese loans with Crude but found that it could not sell enough extra crude in the world markets to get the hard cash required to expand its production. When Sri Lankan Government was unable to repay loans, China took a 99-year lease of its ports. Malaysia, Myanmar, and Nepal are in the process of reconsidering major Chinese investments for the same reason.

Belt and Road are highly risky as a result of their justification are political and not economic. Enshrined within the Communist Party Constitution in 2017, the program could be a cornerstone of Chinese plan to expand its influence and soft power globally. Most Belt and Road loans are channeled through state-owned policy banks that concerned with advancing foreign-policy goals — like winning over new allies — than with earning profits.

One result’s that credit is usually extended with very little regard for money viability or international disposition standards. This helps justify why such a big amount of the first Belt and Road recipients have over up in money distress. As China expands its Belt and Road Initiative around the world, projects offered to develop countries comes are virtually finishing in tears. (Laotian high-speed rail involves mind.)

The International Monetary Fund must be cautious of this dynamic. Although it’s issued warnings about China’s ever-expanding debt load, it is observed that it repeatedly acceded to Chinese demands. It allowed the yuan to become a reserve currency in 2015, for example, although it did not follow any single criterion of a reserve currency. If the International Monetary Fund fails to take a stand on Pakistan, it’ll be encouraging financial loss across the Belt and Road countries.

In considering its aid package, then, the fund ought to exclude reimbursements of Chinese debt or demand an exceptional haircut thereon. It should clarify that it distinguishes between business projects gone awry from foreign-policy ventures that are in the guise of a debt-trap. If China’s leaders wish to splurge overseas on dubious Foreign-Policy projects, it is their business. However, the International Monetary Fund should not get into them once things have gone wrong. In other words, if Governments of China and Pakistan have connived together to make a financial mess out of latter’s finances and with the global financial body to turn it around and then both should bear the brunt together.

Recognizing the same Trump Administration has already indicated International Monetary Fund to avoid financial Bailout package for Government of Pakistan this time.

01 Aug 2018/Wednesday.                                                                   Written by Mohd Tahir Shafi  

Total Page Visits: 470 - Today Page Visits: 1
Show More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Translate »